top of page
Search
Tim Smith

Climate Emergency -part 2

We asked AI - part 2


Q. What would be the implications if Welsh Governmebt used false data or flawed modelling from the Climate change Committee in arriving at the declaration of ‘Climate Emergency’?


A.

If the Welsh Government's climate emergency declaration is based on false information or flawed modeling from the UK Climate Change Committee (UKCCC), it raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and effectiveness of the declaration. The resignation of the UKCCC's chair further highlights the need for scrutiny and independent review of the information and modeling used in making such declarations.


Here are a few potential risks and implications associated with a climate emergency declaration based on false information or flawed modeling:


1. Misguided Policy Decisions: Relying on false information or flawed modeling can lead to misguided policy decisions. If the data and analysis used to declare a climate emergency are inaccurate or incomplete, it can result in policies that do not effectively address the underlying causes and impacts of climate change. This can undermine the government's ability to implement effective measures and achieve the intended outcomes.


2. Lack of Trust and Credibility: A climate emergency declaration should be grounded in sound science and evidence to maintain public trust and credibility. If it is revealed that the declaration was based on false information or flawed modeling, it can erode trust in the government's ability to make informed and responsible decisions. This can undermine public support for climate action and hinder collaboration with stakeholders in future initiatives.


3. Wasted Resources and Opportunities: Declaring a climate emergency often entails allocating resources and implementing measures to address the urgent need for climate action. If the declaration is based on false information or flawed modeling, it can result in the misallocation of resources and missed opportunities for effective action. This can delay progress in combating climate change and addressing its impacts, potentially exacerbating the risks and costs associated with inaction.


To address these risks, it is essential for the Welsh Government to undertake a thorough and independent review of the information and modeling used in the climate emergency declaration. This review should involve experts with diverse perspectives and ensure transparency in the process.


If any inaccuracies or flaws are identified, corrective measures should be taken, including revising policies and communicating transparently with the public to restore trust and credibility.


It is also crucial for the Welsh Government to establish robust mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of climate data and modeling to prevent similar issues in the future. This can involve collaboration with independent scientific institutions and regular peer review processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information used in climate-related decision-making.


Here’s one take on protestors.

Might this not apply to Governments too?


“Whether climate change is as dangerous as each of the defendants may clearly and honestly believe or is not, is irrelevant and does not form any part of the circumstances of the damage.”

Judge Silas Reid - London Inner Crown Court

in the case of five campaigners charged with criminal damage at JP Morgan’s European headquarters on September 1, 2021.

11 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Economics?

Another revealing posts from our friends in Scandinavia: Why should wind power be built? Per Fahlén Published 5 hours ago The debate...

Comments


bottom of page